Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación

Vol. 4, No 8, julio - diciembre 2026, 61-75

ISSN: 3073-1461

https://revistasfiecyt.com/index.php/riced

The use of written feedback in developing english writing skills in

teenagers

El uso de la retroalimentación escrita para el desarrollo de las habilidades de

escritura en inglés en adolescentes

Kelly Pamela Chumaña Herrería

Verónica Gissela Jarrin Escobar

Autor de correspondencia:

kellypamela2619@gmail.com

Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica.

Ecuador.

kellypamela2619@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1245-4719

Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica.

Ecuador.

vjarrin.roale@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1990-0710

Datos del artículo:

Recibido: marzo 14, 2026

Aceptado: abril 09, 2026

Publicación: julio 08, 2026

Keywords:

written feedback, qualitative

research, efl writing, teenage

learners, learner autonomy.

Palabras clave:

comentarios escritos, escritura en

inglés como lengua extranjera,

estudiantes adolescentes, desarrollo

de la escritura.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53877/7hskt363

Este artículo está bajo la licencia

Abstract

Written feedback is a key pedagogical strategy for developing writing

skills in English as a Foreign Language (EFL). This study aimed to

analyze how teachers' written feedback contributes to strengthening

the writing performance of adolescent students, particularly in terms

of grammatical accuracy, text organization, coherence, and

communicative competence. The research adopted a qualitative

approach with a descriptive case study design involving a group of

adolescent students enrolled in an English tutoring center. Data were

collected through the analysis of students' written compositions,

observations of the feedback process, and the interpretation of

students' responses to the teacher's written comments. The findings

revealed that structured and timely written feedback facilitated the

revision and correction of texts, promoted greater awareness of

linguistic errors, and enhanced students' autonomy throughout the

writing process. In addition, an increase in students' confidence and

participation during writing activities was observed. It is concluded

that written feedback is an effective pedagogical tool for improving

English writing performance by fostering the development of linguistic

competencies and supporting students' self-regulated learnin.

Resumen

La retroalimentación escrita es una estrategia pedagógica clave para el

desarrollo de las habilidades de escritura en inglés como lengua

extranjera. Este estudio se realizó para analizar cómo la

retroalimentación escrita del docente contribuye al fortalecimiento de

la producción escrita de estudiantes adolescentes, particularmente en

aspectos relacionados con: precisión gramatical, organización textual,

coherencia y competencia comunicativa. La investigación es de

enfoque cualitativo con diseño de estudio de caso descriptivo,

desarrollado con un grupo de estudiantes adolescentes pertenecientes

a un centro de tutorías de inglés. La información obtenida mediante el

análisis de producciones escritas, observaciones del proceso de

retroalimentación y la interpretación de las respuestas de los

estudiantes frente a las observaciones realizadas por el docente. Los

resultados revelan que la retroalimentación escrita estructurada y

oportuna favoreció la revisión y corrección de los textos, promovió una

mayor conciencia sobre los errores lingüísticos y fortaleció la

autonomía de los estudiantes en el proceso de escritura. Asimismo, se

Kelly Chumaña / Veronica Jarrin

RICEd: Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación, Vol. 4, No 8, julio - diciembre 2026, 61-75 62

observó un incremento en la confianza y la participación durante las

actividades de producción escrita. Se concluye que la retroalimentación

escrita es una herramienta pedagógica eficaz para mejorar el

desempeño en la escritura en inglés, al favorecer el desarrollo de

competencias lingüísticas y la autorregulación del aprendizaje.

Forma sugerida de citar (APA):

Chumaña Herrería , K. P. y Jarrin Escobar, V. G. (2026). The use of written feedback in developing english

writing skills in teenagers. RICEd: Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación. 4(8), 61-75.

https://doi.org/10.53877/7hskt363

INTRODUCTION

In the current context of teaching English as a Foreign Language (EFL), developing writing

skills has become a fundamental priority for adolescent learners, as these skills are essential

for academic achievement and future professional success. Writing is not only an academic

skill; it is also a life skill that helps students organize their thoughts logically, communicate

effectively, and demonstrate their knowledge in various contexts. Moreover, it plays a vital

role in language development because it requires students to apply grammatical rules and use

vocabulary accurately. However, despite continuous instruction and practice, many EFL

learners still struggle to express their ideas clearly and coherently, limiting their ability to

demonstrate their knowledge and hindering their progress in language learning.

Since writing in English provides opportunities to consolidate grammar and

vocabulary in authentic and meaningful contexts, it is essential to implement instructional

strategies that effectively support students' writing development. Among these strategies,

written feedback plays a crucial role in helping students identify and correct mistakes in their

writing, encouraging revision and reflection. By analyzing how teenage EFL learners use

written feedback, this research contributes to the field by providing evidence of how feedback

can be used as a practical pedagogical tool to improve students' academic writing

performance. Furthermore, it offers insights into the development of more dynamic,

engaging, and reflective writing environments that promote language development and

deeper engagement with English as a foreign language.

Understanding how feedback is used is particularly relevant in the Ecuadorian

context, where the national curriculum places strong emphasis on writing as a core skill for

the development of English proficiency. The Ecuadorian curriculum, known as the Currículo

de los Niveles de Educación Obligatoria, states that the ability to produce coherent and well-

structured written texts is a key learning outcome (Ministerio de Educación, 2016). Similarly,

the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) emphasizes the

importance of writing fluently and coherently to demonstrate communicative competence in

a second or foreign language (Council of Europe, 2018). Accordingly, teachers are expected to

help students achieve these standards. Consequently, effective written feedback becomes an

essential pedagogical tool, not only for supporting writing development but also for guiding

students toward achieving the communicative goals required at each level of English learning.

Feedback in writing instruction should not be seen as a simple checklist for correcting

errors but rather as a bridge between what students currently know and what they need to

improve or reinforce. According to Bitchener and Ferris (2012), effective written feedback

helps students enhance grammatical accuracy, organization, and overall confidence in writing

tasks. When feedback is clear, specific, and supportive, it encourages students to reflect

critically on their mistakes and incorporate corrections into subsequent drafts. This reflective

process helps learners become more aware of their writing process and develop autonomy.

The use of written feedback in developing english writing skills in teenagers

Furthermore, written feedback that acknowledges students' efforts while providing

constructive suggestions can increase learners' motivation and encourage deeper engagement

with the writing process.

Moreover, feedback carries an important affective component because writing in a

foreign language is often perceived as intimidating by teenage learners. In this regard, the

motivational dimension of feedback is particularly significant, as many adolescents may feel

confused, frustrated, or insecure when expressing themselves in English. However, when

students receive constructive feedback that highlights their strengths and provides supportive

guidance on how to improve, they are more likely to develop a positive attitude toward

writing (Cen & Zheng, 2024). This sense of encouragement strengthens learners' confidence

and motivates them to take greater risks when using the target language. Furthermore,

fostering a classroom culture where mistakes are viewed as natural and valuable steps in the

learning process can positively transform students' perceptions of writing, making writing

tasks feel less threatening and more meaningful for their academic and linguistic

development.

By examining how teenage EFL students use written feedback, this study aims to

generate valuable insights for both teachers and students. Understanding this process is

crucial not only because it addresses a persistent challenge in language classrooms but also

because it provides evidence that can inform and improve teaching practices. Additionally,

the findings may assist teachers in providing more effective and personalized feedback

tailored to learners' specific needs. Through meaningful feedback, students are encouraged to

reflect on their writing, identify grammatical and organizational weaknesses, and develop

strategies for continuous improvement. As a result, they progressively strengthen their

autonomy and responsibility for learning. Ultimately, effective written feedback enables

students to become more confident and competent writers who are capable of expressing their

ideas clearly, coherently, and accurately in English for both academic and real-world

purposes.

Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze how written feedback contributes to

the development of English writing skills among adolescent EFL learners and to examine its

role in promoting writing accuracy, learner autonomy, and communicative competence.

Figure 1

Problem Tree

Kelly Chumaña / Veronica Jarrin

RICEd: Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación, Vol. 4, No 8, julio - diciembre 2026, 61-75 64

Problem Statement

In many EFL classrooms, particularly among adolescent learners, the development of writing

skills remains a persistent challenge. Despite curricular efforts, technological resources, and

teacher initiatives, many students continue to produce texts characterized by grammatical

inaccuracies, limited vocabulary, and weak organization. Although teachers frequently

provide written feedback through comments, corrections, and suggestions, students do not

always understand how to interpret or apply it to improve their writing. Consequently,

feedback is often perceived as a form of external correction rather than as a learning

opportunity, leading students to make superficial revisions without critically reflecting on

their errors or internalizing strategies for long-term improvement.

This situation reflects a broader pedagogical challenge in which learners are

insufficiently prepared to use written feedback as a tool for developing writing competence

across different tasks. Instead of viewing feedback as part of an active learning process, many

students perceive it as an external evaluation and either disregard corrections or apply them

without meaningful understanding. This situation may result in repeated errors, frustration

among learners and teachers, limited writing development, and negative effects on academic

performance, confidence, and effective communication in English (Ferris, 2004).

The problem becomes more complex when considering current feedback practices. A

key limitation is the lack of explicit instruction on how students should engage with and apply

the feedback they receive, which reduces its potential as a transformative learning strategy

(Washington University in St. Louis, 2026). In the Ecuadorian context, this challenge is

intensified because English is learned as a foreign language and is rarely practiced beyond the

classroom. According to Guerrero and Moreira (2025), limited exposure to English affects

students’ opportunities to develop productive skills such as writing. Furthermore, weak

writing performance can influence achievement in other academic areas where written

communication is essential.

Therefore, understanding how adolescent EFL learners use written feedback to

improve their writing skills represents an important educational need. This problem is related

to two interconnected factors: students’ limited ability to interpret and apply feedback

effectively and feedback practices that often prioritize error correction over meaningful

learning. Investigating how students perceive, interpret, and implement written feedback

may provide valuable insights for designing more effective, motivational, and learner-

centered feedback practices.

The primary beneficiaries of this research are adolescent EFL learners in different

educational contexts where writing is an essential component of language learning. By

exploring how written feedback can be used more effectively, this study seeks to support

students in developing greater autonomy, responsibility, and confidence throughout the

writing process. Feedback should not only identify linguistic problems but also encourage

reflection, self-correction, and the understanding of writing as a recursive process involving

drafting, revision, and improvement.

Another important beneficiary is the teacher-researcher working in a personalized

teaching context. Understanding how students perceive, interpret, and use written feedback

will allow reflection on current teaching practices and the development of strategies that

better respond to learners’ cognitive and emotional needs. This reflective process may

contribute to improving feedback practices, instructional decisions, and students’ writing

development.

This study is based on the assumption that written feedback is a pedagogical strategy

that promotes the development of writing skills among adolescents learning English as a

The use of written feedback in developing english writing skills in teenagers

Foreign Language (EFL). Effective feedback enables students to identify weaknesses, reflect

on their errors, strengthen self-correction processes, and progressively improve their written

production. Based on this assumption, the following research question guides the study: How

is written feedback used by adolescents learning English as a Foreign Language to develop

their writing skills? This question directs the research process toward understanding how

feedback contributes to writing development and its potential as a tool for learning, reflection,

and continuous improvement.

Importance of Writing feedback

This chapter presents the study entitled “The Use of Written Feedback in Developing English

Writing Skills in Teenagers,” which focuses on addressing the challenges faced by adolescent

English learners in developing effective writing skills. The empirical foundation of the study

begins with a review of three relevant previous studies, including two national studies

conducted in Ecuador and one international study from Chile. These studies provide

important insights for the research design and the identification of key variables. Each study

is analyzed considering its authorship, year of publication, objectives, methodological

approach, and main findings, followed by a discussion of its relevance to the current research.

This review demonstrates an understanding of the existing scholarly discussions and situates

the present study within a broader academic context.

The chapter then introduces the theoretical framework that supports the research by

grounding it in recognized linguistic and educational perspectives. It begins with key

concepts related to second language acquisition and establishes connections among relevant

theories and constructs. Subsequently, it focuses on written feedback, its different types, its

role in the development of writing skills, and its cognitive and emotional influence on

adolescent learners. The discussion is supported by contributions from relevant scholars,

providing a solid and reliable theoretical foundation for understanding how written feedback

may contribute to the improvement of English writing abilities.

Previous Studies

This first national study corresponds to González-Torres and Sarango (2023). It aimed to

evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three types of written feedback: direct teacher

feedback, indirect teacher feedback, and peer feedback, focusing on the EFL writing abilities

of high school students. Additionally, it explored students’ perceptions, preferences, and

opinions regarding the usefulness of the feedback received.

The research employed a mixed-method quasi-experimental design supported by

survey components, combining quantitative and qualitative data. Eighty-two Ecuadorian

high school students learning EFL, aged 17 to 18, participated in the study. They were divided

into four groups: three experimental groups receiving different feedback types and one

control group without feedback. The intervention lasted two months and included pre- and

post-tests to measure improvements in writing skills, particularly grammar, coherence, and

organization. A questionnaire was also administered to examine students’ perceptions and

engagement with the feedback process.

The findings showed that all three feedback types produced significant improvements

in writing performance compared with the control group, confirming the value of written

feedback as a tool for developing EFL writing skills among adolescents. However, no

significant differences were found among direct teacher feedback, indirect teacher feedback,

and peer feedback, suggesting that the presence of guided feedback itself contributes to

Kelly Chumaña / Veronica Jarrin

RICEd: Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación, Vol. 4, No 8, julio - diciembre 2026, 61-75 66

writing development. Students particularly valued a combination of teacher and peer

feedback, highlighting the importance of multiple feedback sources in promoting motivation,

understanding, and confidence.

From an EFL teaching perspective, this study provides relevant evidence regarding

the flexibility of feedback practices. It demonstrates that different feedback approaches can

effectively support writing development while emphasizing the collaborative nature of

learning. This perspective aligns with sociocultural theories, which consider teacher guidance

and peer interaction as forms of scaffolding within the learner’s Zone of Proximal

Development (ZPD). As McLeod (2024) explains, the ZPD refers to the difference between

what learners can achieve independently and what they can accomplish with appropriate

support. Therefore, González-Torres and Sarango’s study offers valuable national evidence

on the effectiveness of diverse written feedback strategies and their potential to enhance

adolescent EFL writing development.

The second study is also national and was conducted by Intriago Cañizares and

Ramírez-Ávila (2024). This research aimed to explore how peer feedback influences the

academic writing abilities of first-year university students in Ecuador. Specifically, it

examined learners with B1-B2 English proficiency levels to determine whether participating

in peer feedback activities could improve writing accuracy, fluency, and organization.

The researchers conducted an action research study using mixed methods at a private

university in Guayaquil. Sixty first-year students participated in a sixteen-week intervention.

The quantitative component included pre- and post-tests to measure changes in grammar,

structure, and fluency, while the qualitative component involved questionnaires exploring

students’ experiences and perceptions of peer feedback. This approach allowed the

researchers to assess both measurable improvements and learners’ attitudes toward the

feedback process.

The findings showed significant progress in students’ writing abilities, with a medium

effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.39), indicating a positive impact of peer feedback on academic

writing development. Students reported benefits such as greater awareness of errors,

collaborative learning, and improved reflective thinking through peer evaluation. However,

challenges were also identified, including uncertainty about evaluating classmates’ work and

hesitation when accepting peer comments. These results demonstrate the complex nature of

peer feedback, which can promote learner autonomy while requiring appropriate guidance.

From an EFL teaching perspective, this study provides relevant evidence on the role

of peer feedback in writing development. Although the participants were university students,

the findings are applicable to adolescent learners because peer feedback fosters awareness,

metacognitive skills, and collaboration. Nevertheless, effective implementation requires

teacher support through scaffolding strategies, such as models, evaluation criteria, and clear

guidelines. Overall, Intriago Cañizares and Ramírez-Ávila’s study highlights peer feedback

as a valuable component of a comprehensive feedback approach that complements teacher

input and promotes autonomy, confidence, and collaborative learning.

The last study is international and was conducted in Chile by Kloss and Quintanilla

(2024). This research aimed to explore how second-language learners perceive written

feedback as a teaching and learning strategy in higher education. Unlike studies focused

mainly on linguistic outcomes, it examined how students interpret feedback, value the

comments received, and relate their perceptions to effective language learning practices.

The researchers administered an online survey to 202 university students enrolled in

an English course in Chile. The questionnaire collected quantitative and qualitative data

regarding the types of feedback students received, their preferences, perceptions of

The use of written feedback in developing english writing skills in teenagers

usefulness, and experiences with writing. This mixed-methods approach allowed researchers

to identify general trends while also exploring students’ personal perspectives on feedback.

The findings revealed that students had clear preferences regarding feedback,

although these often differed from pedagogical recommendations. While educational theory

emphasizes feedback as a tool for reflection and self-correction, students mainly associated

effective writing support with surface-level corrections, such as grammar, spelling, and

punctuation. They tended to view feedback as a final product rather than as part of an ongoing

learning process.

From an EFL teaching perspective, this study highlights the importance of considering

learners’ perceptions of feedback. Although the participants were university students, the

findings are relevant to adolescent learners because students’ understanding of feedback

influences how effectively they use it. If feedback is perceived only as error correction, its

potential to develop reflection, organization, and self-editing skills may be limited.

Therefore, teachers should balance students’ immediate expectations with a broader,

process-oriented approach to feedback. Gradually guiding learners to recognize feedback as

a tool for improvement can increase engagement, autonomy, and confidence. In summary,

Kloss and Quintanilla’s study emphasizes the need to align feedback practices with learners’

perspectives, ensuring that feedback becomes both meaningful and pedagogically effective.

Sociocultural Theory

Sociocultural Theory, developed by Vygotsky (1978), offers a powerful lens for understanding

how language learning occurs as a socially mediated process rather than an isolated cognitive

activity. According to Vygotsky, learning is not simply the internalization of knowledge

transmitted by teachers but rather the result of meaningful interaction with others and the use

of cultural tools, language being the most fundamental. Within this theory, one of the central

concepts is the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), defined as the distance between what

a learner can achieve independently and what they can accomplish with guidance or

collaboration. The ZPD highlights the idea that learners progress most effectively when

supported through structured assistance, or scaffolding, provided by a more capable peer,

teacher, or mediated tool.

Likewise, James P. Donato (1994) introduced the concept of collective scaffolding,

emphasizing that knowledge is not constructed solely through teacher guidance but also

through collaborative interactions among peers. Within this shared learning space, students

support one another by exchanging ideas, negotiating meaning, and solving problems

collectively, enabling them to accomplish tasks that would be difficult to complete

independently. In the context of writing, this suggests that learners benefit not only from

teachers’ written feedback but also from discussing their texts with classmates, comparing

perspectives, and reflecting on different suggestions for improvement. Such interactions

encourage students to become active participants in the revision process rather than passive

recipients of corrections.

Similarly, Mohamad (2023) argues that Sociocultural Theory (SCT) places particular

emphasis on interaction and learners’ active participation in the learning environment. From

this perspective, learning is understood as a dynamic and socially mediated process in which

cognitive development occurs through dialogue, collaboration, and meaningful participation

in authentic learning activities. Consequently, written feedback should not be viewed merely

as a mechanism for correcting linguistic errors but as a mediational tool that promotes

reflection, self-regulation, and the gradual internalization of writing strategies. Teacher

comments, peer feedback, and subsequent discussions create opportunities for learners to

Kelly Chumaña / Veronica Jarrin

RICEd: Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación, Vol. 4, No 8, julio - diciembre 2026, 61-75 68

interpret feedback, negotiate its meaning, and apply it in subsequent writing tasks, thereby

facilitating movement from their current level of performance toward higher levels of

competence.

Applying Sociocultural Theory to teenage EFL learners is particularly relevant because

adolescents are at a developmental stage in which social interaction strongly influences both

cognitive and affective learning processes. Since English is primarily learned within the

classroom in EFL contexts, interactions with teachers and peers become essential sources of

linguistic input, guidance, and support. Therefore, written feedback can function as an

effective scaffold only when students actively engage with it, reflect on its meaning, and use

it to revise and improve their writing. This theoretical perspective directly supports the

present study by framing written feedback as an interactive learning process rather than a

one-way transmission of corrections, highlighting its potential to foster writing development,

learner autonomy, and continuous improvement.

Adolescents tend to think that hanging out with friends and getting their peeps'

approval is super important for figuring out who they are and what drives them. Feedback,

therefore, is not just a cognitive aid but also an affective and motivational tool. When teachers

give clear direction or when classmates work together and give feedback, students get the

right support to try out tougher writing stuff within their ZPD like, a kid who's having a tough

time making their writing flow smoothly might get some pointers from their teacher on how

to use stuff like 'however' or 'furthermore' to connect ideas better.

So basically, Sociocultural Theory establishes the theoretical foundation for this study

by framing written feedback as a mediating practice that allows learners to progress within

their ZPD, seeing written feedback as a way for learners to move forward in their ZPD Teacher

and peer feedback act like support beams that help students write better than they could on

their own this view highlights how key it is to work together, help each other out, and have

some guidance to really boost writing skills in the EFL classroom.

Written Feedback

Written feedback is one of the most influential tools in second language writing instruction,

as it provides learners with direct input on their written performance while guiding them

toward improvement. Feedback refers to the information that teachers give to students about

their writing to enhance accuracy, coherence, and overall quality. In addition, Ellis (2009)

explains that direct feedback occurs when the teacher explicitly corrects, such as rewriting an

incorrect verb tense or adding a missing article. This type of feedback is clear and immediately

understandable, making it especially helpful for lower-level learners who may struggle to

identify their errors.

Written feedback shouldn’t be seen as mere error correction but rather as a tool for

metalinguistic reflection. By engaging with comments, students notice patterns in their

mistakes, understand underlying rules, and take greater responsibility for their learning

(Tamayo & Cajas, 2017). This perspective positions feedback as a developmental process that

extends beyond the correction of isolated sentences to build long-term writing competence.

In the context of teenage EFL learners, written feedback plays a crucial role; it provides

learners with specific guidance for improving their grammar, vocabulary, organization, and

style. Similarly, peer feedback can promote a sense of collaboration, making writing a shared

learning experience rather than a solitary task. By incorporating different types of feedback,

the study aims to explore not only their effectiveness in improving writing accuracy but also

their impact on learner engagement, autonomy, and confidence.

The use of written feedback in developing english writing skills in teenagers

Writing Skills in EFL Contexts

The acquisition and development of writing skills in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL)

context has long been recognized as one of the most complex aspects of language learning.

Unlike speaking, which often develops naturally through interaction, writing requires

learners to engage in deliberate processes of linguistic organization, planning, and revision

(Khudaverdiyeva, 2025). Writing involves not only expressing ideas through words but also

structuring them coherently, selecting appropriate vocabulary, and applying grammatical

accuracy. This complexity makes writing particularly challenging for EFL learners, who often

have limited exposure to authentic written input and few opportunities for meaningful

practice.

Richards and Renandya (2002) highlight that writing in EFL is demanding because it

requires simultaneous control of multiple cognitive and linguistic resources. Students must

manage grammar, vocabulary, spelling, punctuation, and text organization while adapting

their writing to specific purposes and contexts. Moreover, they may lack the cultural and

rhetorical knowledge needed to construct effective arguments or narratives. For teenage

learners, these challenges can be intensified by developmental factors, such as limited

engagement with revision processes or the perception of writing as an evaluative rather than

developmental activity.

Another important aspect is that EFL writing involves not only linguistic knowledge

but also connections with other language skills and cultural contexts. Writing is closely related

to reading, as students use texts as models; speaking, since oral interaction often precedes

written production; and listening, as learners receive input that influences their written

expression (Bežilová, 2024). Therefore, developing writing skills requires instructional

approaches that integrate feedback, guided practice, and progressive skill development.

Writing instruction should incorporate authentic tasks that demonstrate how writing

functions beyond the classroom and serves as a means of effective communication.

For this reason, guided practice and feedback play an essential role in the development

of EFL writing. Learners benefit from explicit modeling, opportunities to draft, and

continuous cycles of feedback and revision. Thus, writing instruction moves beyond product-

oriented approaches, which focus mainly on the final text, toward process-oriented

approaches that emphasize reflection, improvement, and learner development. This

perspective is particularly relevant for teenagers, whose writing abilities are still developing

and who require supportive scaffolding to manage linguistic and organizational demands.

In the context of this study, writing skills represent the central focus of the research

objectives. Written feedback provided by teachers or peers functions as a form of guided

practice, enabling learners to identify weaknesses, reflect on errors, and progressively

improve accuracy, coherence, and organization. By understanding writing as a

multidimensional skill involving linguistic, cognitive, and social processes, this study

considers feedback not merely as correction but as a structured learning opportunity that

helps bridge the gap between learners’ current abilities and their desired proficiency levels.

Written Corrective Feedback (WCF)

Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) has become one of the most debated topics in second

language acquisition (SLA) and English as a Foreign Language (EFL) pedagogy. It refers to

feedback provided by teachers or peers on learners’ written texts to highlight linguistic errors

and encourage improvement (Ellis, 2009). WCF focuses mainly on syntax, vocabulary,

mechanics, and organization, helping students recognize differences between their current

Kelly Chumaña / Veronica Jarrin

RICEd: Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación, Vol. 4, No 8, julio - diciembre 2026, 61-75 70

performance and target language conventions. Beyond correction, it serves as a pedagogical

tool that promotes reflection and metalinguistic awareness.

Direct and indirect corrective feedback represent two major approaches in WCF

research. Direct feedback provides the correct form, such as correcting verb tense or spelling

errors, while indirect feedback indicates the presence of an error through strategies such as

underlining or error codes, allowing learners to identify and correct it independently. Direct

feedback may be more suitable for beginners with limited linguistic knowledge, whereas

indirect feedback encourages deeper cognitive engagement and learner autonomy. Both

approaches can complement each other depending on learners’ proficiency and instructional

objectives.

Another important distinction concerns focused and unfocused WCF. Focused WCF

addresses specific error categories, such as article use or verb tense, while unfocused WCF

targets multiple types of errors simultaneously. Although focused feedback may promote

long-term accuracy by allowing learners to concentrate on specific features, unfocused

feedback reflects more authentic communication contexts. Therefore, the selection of each

approach depends on learners’ needs, proficiency levels, and the characteristics of the writing

task.

In EFL classrooms, WCF is closely connected to process-oriented writing instruction.

When integrated into drafting and revision cycles, feedback becomes part of an ongoing

learning process rather than a single correction. This perspective aligns with sociocultural

theory, as feedback functions as scaffolding that supports learners within their Zone of

Proximal Development (Vygotsky, 1978). Students do not simply receive corrections; they

actively construct understanding through interaction with teachers and peers, gradually

internalizing linguistic knowledge.

For the present study, WCF is considered a fundamental instructional tool that

supports teenage EFL learners in improving accuracy, coherence, and organization. By

addressing linguistic errors while encouraging reflection, WCF connects language

development with writing improvement and provides valuable insights into how learners

perceive, interpret, and respond to feedback.

Synthesis of Framework: From Theory to Practice

This study is framed by Sociocultural Theory, where written feedback, whether provided by

teachers (direct or indirect) or peers, functions as scaffolding within the Zone of Proximal

Development (ZPD). The key concepts reviewed are interconnected and guide the

intervention process. Written Feedback represents the broader pedagogical strategy, while

Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) is examined as a specific form that provides guidance for

error correction. Learner Perceptions of Feedback contribute to understanding how students

interpret and apply feedback, while Peer Feedback reflects the collaborative dimension of

scaffolding and sociocultural learning.

The conceptual progression moves from general theory to the specific constructs

applied in this study, establishing theoretical coherence to support the research design and

selected instruments. Ultimately, feedback is understood not as a mere corrective mechanism

but as an interactive and developmental process that helps learners progress beyond their

independent performance. This perspective provides the foundation for the methodological

approach presented in the following chapter.

The use of written feedback in developing english writing skills in teenagers

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Research Design

This study adopts a qualitative single-case study design complemented by descriptive

elements, as it seeks to explore in depth how written feedback contributes to the development

of writing skills among adolescent students of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) within a

specific educational context. According to Yin (2018), case study research is appropriate when

researchers aim to analyze a contemporary phenomenon within its real-life context,

particularly when the boundaries between the phenomenon and its context are not clearly

defined. Similarly, Merriam and Tisdell (2016) state that qualitative case studies enable a

comprehensive understanding of educational experiences through the detailed analysis of

participants’ perspectives, behaviors, and practices.

Therefore, this design was considered appropriate because the purpose of the study

was not to generalize findings, but rather to understand how written feedback is perceived,

interpreted, and applied by students within a specific tutoring environment. This approach

allowed the researcher to examine feedback as a learning process, considering both the

development of writing skills and students’ experiences throughout the revision process.

Research Context and Participants

The study was conducted in a private tutoring center that provides academic support and

personalized instruction to school-aged students learning English as a foreign language.

Unlike traditional educational institutions, the center offers individual and small-group

tutoring sessions adapted to students’ academic needs, focusing on reinforcement activities,

homework support, and skill development. This context provided a suitable environment for

examining written feedback practices due to the personalized interaction between teachers

and learners.

The participants were selected through convenience sampling, considering their

accessibility and active participation in the English tutoring program. The sample consisted

of 15 adolescent students between 13 and 16 years old who regularly attended English

tutoring sessions during the academic period of the study. Their English proficiency levels

ranged approximately from A2 to B1 according to the Common European Framework of

Reference for Languages (CEFR), indicating that they possessed basic grammatical knowledge

and vocabulary but continued to experience difficulties producing coherent and accurate

written texts.

The inclusion criteria were: (a) being an adolescent student enrolled in the tutoring

program, (b) regularly participating in English writing activities, and (c) voluntarily agreeing

to participate in the study. Before data collection, informed consent was obtained from parents

or legal guardians, and student assent was collected, ensuring compliance with ethical

principles. Participation was voluntary, and anonymity was guaranteed throughout the

research process.

Data Collection Techniques and Instruments

Data collection involved multiple qualitative techniques to obtain a comprehensive

understanding of students’ experiences with written feedback. Initially, a semi-structured

interview was conducted with the owner of the tutoring center to gather contextual

Kelly Chumaña / Veronica Jarrin

RICEd: Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación, Vol. 4, No 8, julio - diciembre 2026, 61-75 72

information about the institution, its educational approach, students’ characteristics,

academic needs, and existing feedback practices. Additionally, this interview provided

authorization to access the research setting and invite potential participants.

The main data collection process included semi-structured interviews with the

participating students, analysis of their written productions and the feedback provided on

these texts, and observations of writing activities and interactions related to feedback.

Students completed different writing tasks, including personal paragraphs, descriptive texts,

and responses to guided prompts. These written samples served as primary evidence for

examining how feedback influenced students’ revision processes and writing development.

The activities were conducted during tutoring sessions under similar conditions to ensure

consistency, and students were encouraged to complete their texts independently before

receiving feedback.

Furthermore, a questionnaire was administered to explore students’ perceptions of

written feedback. It included closed-ended questions to identify general attitudes and

preferences, as well as open-ended questions that allowed participants to express their

experiences and opinions in greater depth. The combination of interviews, writing samples,

observations, and questionnaires enabled data triangulation, providing a broader perspective

on both the development of writing skills and learners’ interpretations of feedback.

Data Analysis

The collected data were analyzed through qualitative thematic analysis. This process involved

identifying recurring patterns, categories, and themes related to students’ perceptions of

feedback, revision practices, and writing improvement. The analysis focused on

understanding how students interpreted feedback, how they incorporated it into their writing

processes, and how feedback contributed to their development as EFL writers.

This analytical approach allowed written feedback to be examined beyond its

traditional role as a mechanism for correcting linguistic errors, recognizing it instead as a

pedagogical process that involves reflection, interaction, and continuous improvement.

Validity, Reliability, and Trustworthiness

To ensure the trustworthiness of the study, several strategies were implemented. Content

validity was addressed by designing all data collection instruments in accordance with the

research objectives. Interview questions, questionnaire items, and writing tasks were

developed to directly address the main constructs of the study: written feedback, writing

development, and learner perceptions. Additionally, the instruments were reviewed by a peer

colleague to improve their clarity and relevance.

Reliability was strengthened by maintaining consistency throughout the data

collection process. Writing activities were conducted under comparable conditions during

tutoring sessions, and feedback was provided following structured criteria, including direct,

indirect, and metalinguistic feedback approaches when applicable. The same questionnaire

was applied to all participants to ensure consistency in the information collected.

Another important strategy was methodological triangulation. The study combined

different sources of evidence, including interviews, questionnaires, written productions, and

observations, allowing the researcher to compare information from multiple perspectives and

reduce potential bias. Finally, ethical procedures were followed throughout the study by

obtaining informed consent, protecting participants’ identities, and ensuring the

The use of written feedback in developing english writing skills in teenagers

confidentiality of the collected information. These procedures contributed to the credibility

and dependability of the findings within the scope of this qualitative case study.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this study provide insights into the role of written feedback in the

development of writing skills among adolescent EFL learners within a specific tutoring

context. The results suggest that written feedback represents not only a mechanism for

identifying linguistic errors but also a learning process that encourages students to reflect on

their written productions, recognize areas for improvement, and progressively develop their

writing abilities. This perspective is consistent with Bitchener and Ferris (2013), who

emphasize that written corrective feedback can contribute to second language writing

development when learners actively engage with the feedback provided. Similarly, Ellis

(2009) highlights that different types of written corrective feedback may influence learners’

attention to linguistic aspects and support the improvement of written accuracy.

The participants’ experiences indicate that feedback should be understood as an

interactive process rather than a simple correction procedure. The analysis revealed that

students’ perceptions and responses to feedback played an important role in how they revised

and improved their texts. This finding is consistent with the sociocultural perspective

proposed by Vygotsky (1978), which considers learning as a process mediated through

interaction and support. In this sense, written feedback can function as a form of scaffolding

that guides learners toward greater independence in the writing process, as suggested by

Donato (1994) in relation to collective scaffolding in second language learning.

The study also highlights the importance of revision practices in EFL writing

development. Through the analysis of students’ written productions and their interaction

with feedback, it was possible to observe how revision contributed to a deeper understanding

of writing as a process involving planning, reflection, and improvement. This aligns with

Richards and Renandya (2002), who argue that writing instruction in language learning

should move beyond the final product and emphasize the processes involved in composing

texts. Additionally, Khudaverdiyeva (2025) points out that writing development involves

cognitive, communicative, and pedagogical dimensions that require continuous practice and

feedback.

Regarding the role of the learning context, the findings demonstrate that the tutoring

environment provided a specific space where students could receive guidance and engage

with feedback practices. Since this study was conducted in a particular educational setting,

the results should not be generalized to all EFL learners; however, they provide valuable

information about how students experience and apply written feedback in similar contexts.

This interpretation is consistent with Yin (2018) and Merriam and Tisdell (2016), who

emphasize that qualitative case studies aim to achieve an in-depth understanding of

phenomena within their real contexts rather than statistical generalization.

The findings also reinforce the relevance of considering students’ perspectives when

analyzing feedback practices. Understanding how learners interpret, accept, and use written

feedback is essential because the effectiveness of feedback depends not only on the teacher’s

comments but also on students’ active participation in the revision process. Therefore,

feedback practices should promote reflection, autonomy, and meaningful engagement with

writing tasks.

This study contributes to the understanding of written feedback as a pedagogical

resource for EFL writing development. The evidence obtained suggests that feedback can

support learners in becoming more aware of their writing processes and developing strategies

Kelly Chumaña / Veronica Jarrin

RICEd: Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación, Vol. 4, No 8, julio - diciembre 2026, 61-75 74

for improvement. Future research could explore larger groups of learners, different

educational contexts, or comparative approaches involving other feedback modalities, such

as peer feedback or technology-assisted feedback, to expand understanding of how feedback

influences second language writing development.

CONCLUSIONS

This study aimed to explore how written feedback contributes to the development of English

writing skills among adolescent EFL learners within a specific tutoring context. The findings

show that written feedback is not limited to correcting linguistic errors; rather, it functions as

a learning process that encourages students to reflect on their written productions, recognize

areas for improvement, and gradually develop their writing abilities.

A key conclusion of this study is that the effectiveness of written feedback depends on

its quality and the way students interpret and use it. Feedback that is clear, specific, and

constructive supports learners in understanding their difficulties and making meaningful

revisions. Therefore, feedback should be viewed as a form of guidance that promotes active

participation, reflection, and greater responsibility in the writing process.

The study also concludes that written feedback involves both cognitive and emotional

dimensions. Students’ confidence, motivation, and willingness to revise their texts are

influenced by the way feedback is communicated. Consequently, teachers should adopt

supportive feedback practices that combine correction with encouragement, creating an

environment that facilitates learning and continuous improvement.

Finally, the findings highlight the importance of the educational context in shaping

feedback practices. The personalized nature of the tutoring environment allowed closer

interaction between teachers and students, providing opportunities for individualized

guidance according to learners’ needs. Although the study was conducted in a specific context

with a limited number of participants, it provides valuable insights into the role of written

feedback in EFL writing development and suggests the need for further research in different

educational settings.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES

Bežilová, V. (2024). Enhancing EFL vocabulary acquisition through storytelling.

ResearchGate. https://short.do/NQJ7Ql

Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2013). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition

and writing. Routledge. https://short.do/7ZXaO1

Cañizares, F., & Ramírez, M. (2024). Peer feedback and its impact on university students’

writing. AtoZ: Novas Práticas em Informação e Conhecimento, 13, 1–9.

https://doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v13i0.90734

Cen, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2024). The motivational aspect of feedback: A meta-analysis on the effect

of different feedback practices on L2 learners’ writing motivation. Assessing Writing.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100802

Council of Europe. (2018). Common European framework of reference for languages:

Learning, teaching, assessment—Companion volume. Council of Europe.

https://n9.cl/05o3wb

Crosthwaite, P. (2024). The grass is not always greener: Teacher vs. GPT-assisted written

corrective feedback. ResearchGate. https://short.do/pRNQGX

The use of written feedback in developing english writing skills in teenagers

Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G.

Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Ablex

Publishing.

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107.

https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023

Ferris, D. R. (2004). The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where

do we go from here? Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 49–62.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005

Gonzalez, P., & Sarango, C. (2023). Effectiveness of teacher and peer feedback in EFL writing:

A case of high school students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and

Educational Research, 22, 73–86.

Guerrero, S., & Moreira, A. (2025). Ecuadorian EFL teachers’ experiences in fostering students’

[título incompleto]. UNESUM-Ciencias, 9(2), 124–136. https://short.do/DUsut4

Khudaverdiyeva, T. (2025). The importance of writing in language acquisition: A cognitive,

communicative and pedagogical perspective. ResearchGate. https://n9.cl/bpjbdp

Kloss, S., & Quintanilla, A. (2024). Self-revision strategies in argumentative writing: A study

with teaching students. https://n9.cl/hpz6t

McLeod, S. (2024). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development. ResearchGate.

https://n9.cl/x75m0

Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. (2016). Currículo de los niveles de educación

obligatoria: Área de Lengua y Literatura. Ministerio de Educación.

https://educacion.gob.ec

Mohamad, A. (2023). Socio-cultural theory and its impact on better language learning

environment for EFL learners in Oman. ResearchGate. https://short.do/F_m7wS

Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.). (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An

anthology of current practice. Cambridge University Press.

Tamayo, M., & Cajas, D. (2017). Strategies of metalinguistic and recast feedback during oral

interactions. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 19(2), 195–208.

https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.11315

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.

Harvard University Press.

Washington University in St. Louis. (2026). Using peer review to help students improve their

writing. Center for Teaching and Learning. https://short.do/4xpBM2.